Secured container compromise: Limit by loot value

[Frizzled]

There are two sides of the secured container argument (streamers and causals). I imagine neither will like this solution (but that's the definition of a compromise).

TLDR: Limit loot that can be placed in a secured container by value.

Placing a cap on what can be placed in a secured container, based on its price, seems like the best solution for everyone. For casuals: it allows them to still make it out with decent loot if they die. Streamers can punish hatchet runners knowing they may have a Ledx, Kibba key, or other high end loot. 

I definitely consider myself in the casual camp but the message from Nikka is clear. This is going to change, hopefully in a way that does not drive droves of people from the game. 

[LoginTaken]

44 minutes ago, Frizzled said:

I definitely consider myself in the casual camp but the message from Nikka is clear. This is going to change, hopefully in a way that does not drive droves of people from the game. 

You can sure bet that it will.

[sleava]

As much as I hate hatchetlings/pistolings who rush high loot spawns, I don't like this idea. If you find a high value item, you should be able to stash it: its the main benefit of having a secure container. 

[Hamm]

pretty sure the community already had a poll on what they wanted( which was leave the gamma how it is). but will the devs listen to the community? prolly not cause they dont care, as long as there "niche"/streamers are happy then they will be happy, who cares what the community wants

[Frizzled]

On 11/23/2019 at 4:40 PM, sleava said:

As much as I hate hatchetlings/pistolings who rush high loot spawns, I don't like this idea. If you find a high value item, you should be able to stash it: its the main benefit of having a secure container. 

This could be configured: at some point you should have to extract your loot (~1 million Ru?).