Jump to content

Is armour too weak, both from a realism perspective and a good/fun game perspective?


Recommended Posts

Prolapsed

I look at all the level 3/4/5 armour in the game don't see the benefit of it, guns are fast and accurate while top ammunition is easy to come by so if it's shot the bullets are going to go straight through it, or stop only one or two shots before penetrating.

But there's a lot of videos on the internet that show armour stopping rounds they don't in game, as well as showing much higher durability. See the videos below showing what some plates are capable of, such as the 6B45 stopping M995 and multiple 855A1's.

Even if mid level armour only had a % chance of stopping higher level rounds it'd make the game more entertaining because the current games TTK seems extremely fast, combined the TTK, questionable recoil mechanics & server latency makes much of the equipment in the game pointless because you are dead before you can react, which is a shame.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
GeneralBrus

its too weak and too strong from a realism perspective,

bunch of bullets are way too strong and others are way too weak.

Armor plate update is coming, so guess well have to wait and see how BSG will change things...

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Prolapsed

I hope so, I love the realism aspect of EFT, it is what got me interested in Tarkov in the first place, but until they do something to stop people mag dumping in the general direction of your face while strafing around like a cartoon character until one bullet hits Head-Eyes it'd be nice to survive some more rounds to armour.

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 4/7/2021 at 11:51 AM, GeneralBrus said:

its too weak and too strong from a realism perspective,

bunch of bullets are way too strong and others are way too weak.

Armor plate update is coming, so guess well have to wait and see how BSG will change things...

This for sure.  I also think plate carriers need to be as versatile as they are in real life.  Certain plate carriers like the IOTV have side plates, soft armor panels that cover more of the body + AR500 or Ceramic plate slots. Carriers have different plate size accommodations, and also the ability to add IIIa trauma panels behind any hard plates.  Some carriers only allow hard plates but you could also put the trauma panels behind they just don't cover as much of the body, only behind the plate.  That dynamic, combined with the revamping of the penetration system (a lot of the lower tier rounds would not be absorbed as completely and in such great numbers, and some of the higher tier armor would take a lot more hits from mid to higher tier rounds).  Definitely getting a little sub atomic, so to speak, with damaging armor would make it more realistic.    Physical movement from being hit by a bullet would also add to the realism, like being pushed back, falling, stumbling, spinning, turning, etc.   I know this is a lot to ask, the plate mechanics would need to replace the entire current armor level system, and a knew formula would need to be created for armor values, as well as making the new models and items, textures, and ammo \ projectile damage system.   A lot to ask, but it would be beautiful.

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Servicer_Skynet

Here's my take:

We can't go about this conventionally. The whole plate carrier thing?

Throw that, the FRICK, out.

Plate Carriers are made for maximum speed and the minimum of survivability. It is there to prevent the vital organs from being struck and that is all. It assumes a logistical backbone that you do not have the luxury of. It assumes there is a rescuing BLUFOR operator, and then a medevac to a trauma team who will keep you alive with state of the art surgical equipment.

In Tarkov, you are most likely it. You are every bit of support you will ever get. You have to be able to take several hits and get out with a minimum of damage. You need to avoid as many firefights as possible, and stick to ambushes where you have the best chances.

You aren't minimizing survivability for speed and stamina, you're trying to survive. You don't have a hospital, you have a trauma kit.

I honestly think that BSG should let us tinker with armour configuration as we like. Maybe you're a speed>protection guy. Maybe you're someone who prefers a mix of both. Maybe you want to armour up as much as possible.

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 часа назад, Servicer_Skynet сказал:

 

In Tarkov, you are most likely it. You are every bit of support you will ever get. You have to be able to take several hits and get out with a minimum of damage.

 

That actually calls for some heavy PLATES, and probably even hard limb armor. Much to buckshoteers chagrin.

Link to post
Share on other sites
GeneralBrus
15 hours ago, Servicer_Skynet said:

Here's my take:

We can't go about this conventionally. The whole plate carrier thing?

Throw that, the FRICK, out.

Plate Carriers are made for maximum speed and the minimum of survivability. It is there to prevent the vital organs from being struck and that is all. It assumes a logistical backbone that you do not have the luxury of. It assumes there is a rescuing BLUFOR operator, and then a medevac to a trauma team who will keep you alive with state of the art surgical equipment.

In Tarkov, you are most likely it. You are every bit of support you will ever get. You have to be able to take several hits and get out with a minimum of damage. You need to avoid as many firefights as possible, and stick to ambushes where you have the best chances.

You aren't minimizing survivability for speed and stamina, you're trying to survive. You don't have a hospital, you have a trauma kit.

I honestly think that BSG should let us tinker with armour configuration as we like. Maybe you're a speed>protection guy. Maybe you're someone who prefers a mix of both. Maybe you want to armour up as much as possible.

 

so basically you are saying: "Lets not add plate carriers, cuz thats what soldiers are using, we are however on our own and without a army to fix us up when we get shot"

Okay fair enough, however tell me, what are the alternatives? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Servicer_Skynet
11 hours ago, GeneralBrus said:

so basically you are saying: "Lets not add plate carriers, cuz thats what soldiers are using, we are however on our own and without a army to fix us up when we get shot"

Okay fair enough, however tell me, what are the alternatives? 

You misunderstand:

I propose that in addition to conventional plate carriers, we look further into adding higher coverage than usual solutions. Having two plates is fine, but honestly given the situation its just more useful to have higher coverage over mobility.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...